Following my blog back in March “Parliament may wish to consider whether to replace a law which denies Mrs Owens any present entitlement to a divorce...”
This must surely be the stand-out statement in the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court, in the long awaited defended divorce of Owens v Owens yesterday.
In the 21st century, where people are free to marry, cohabit, have children in and outside of marriage and also inside and outside of heterosexual relationships, how can it possibly be fair for someone to have to remain married to their spouse for 5 years after that relationship has broken down irretrievably?
Let’s hope Parliament heeds the advice of the Supreme Court to replace the outdated divorce laws with which British society is lumbered, and that we don’t have to wait too long before they do so!
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.