Asbestos Victims Can Be Compensated Within Months

The prognosis for many victims of asbestos-related cancer is, sadly, poor. Malignant mesothelioma, an incurable cancer of the lining of the lungs, normally develops many years after a person's initial exposure to asbestos and it is not possible to predict whether it will occur until symptoms develop. By this time, the disease is often at an advanced stage and many sufferers die shortly after diagnosis. Very often, victims of the disease do not have time to wait for their damages claims to reach court. However, as one High Court case has revealed, special rules apply which make it much easier for them to prove their cases and to win compensation on account at an early stage.

The case concerned an 85-year-old former plumber and heating engineer who had been diagnosed with mesothelioma and told that he had only about a year to live. Given the obvious need for expedition, his lawyers swiftly launched proceedings against a company which had employed him for the last 14 years of his working life.

The company denied liability. However, it only took a telephone call to a judge to secure an interim damages payout for the pensioner. The judge noted that, by virtue of the Compensation Act 2006, it was only necessary for the man to show that he had been exposed to asbestos whilst in the company's employ and that the exposure arose because of its breach of duty. If those points could be established, he was entitled to be fully compensated by the company irrespective of whether he had been wrongfully exposed to asbestos by previous employers.

In dismissing the company's appeal against the judge's ruling, the High Court found that the pensioner had a real prospect of proving that it was responsible for his exposure to asbestos. It would also be unrealistic to think that the company could demonstrate that any such exposure was other than in breach of duty.

Pending a final settlement or a full hearing of his case, the company was ordered to pay the pensioner £50,000 on account, plus £5,000 towards his legal costs.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.